Made with Love

Daily rating for Sunshine Girl

Status
Not open for further replies.

LickingGravity

Reviewer
Joined Sep 9, 2010
Messages 4,747
You guys need to go to the optthomologist and get your width perception checked . those hips are normal in the 36" range. Unless you think she has a 34 in waist. As you correctly observed there wasn't much shape which sort serves as evidence the hips aren't that big.

Nonetheless she is a semi-train wreck starting with the costumes and navel tat and Boscoe is spot on with the 6 in my opinion.
 

tboy

Well-known member
Joined Jun 2, 2010
Messages 9,197
You guys need to go to the optthomologist and get your width perception checked . those hips are normal in the 36" range. Unless you think she has a 34 in waist. As you correctly observed there wasn't much shape which sort serves as evidence the hips aren't that big.

Nonetheless she is a semi-train wreck starting with the costumes and navel tat and Boscoe is spot on with the 6 in my opinion.

Not sure how old you are but I grew up in a time when normal aka average was 32/34...now normal/average is 36 38.....so normal to me is 32/34 and those are NOT 34 hips.....maybe if she's 5' tall, but she doesn't appear to be. If she's 5'8" or more? those hips are 38 or more....

I don't know what your problem is with me and my preferences, what's it to you anyways? It's not like I'm forcing my preferences on you and saying "you MUST like what I like or it's the gas chamber...."......chill dude, really.....if you like em hippy, more power to you because you have far more choices than I do......at my age it is getting quite difficult to find someone who isn't a wide glide with a front bum.....
 

Maurice Boscorelli

Senior Member
Joined May 30, 2010
Messages 19,322
May 15 2011

May 15 2011

bYoio.jpg
EdCBV.jpg
nvptP.jpg


That is a killer body right there.........9/10
 

LickingGravity

Reviewer
Joined Sep 9, 2010
Messages 4,747
Not sure how old you are but I grew up in a time when normal aka average was 32/34...now normal/average is 36 38.....so normal to me is 32/34 and those are NOT 34 hips.....maybe if she's 5' tall, but she doesn't appear to be. If she's 5'8" or more? those hips are 38 or more....

I don't know what your problem is with me and my preferences, what's it to you anyways? It's not like I'm forcing my preferences on you and saying "you MUST like what I like or it's the gas chamber...."......chill dude, really.....if you like em hippy, more power to you because you have far more choices than I do......at my age it is getting quite difficult to find someone who isn't a wide glide with a front bum.....

Actually, I'm fairly certain that hip's are narrower these days than 30 years ago. I have no problem with your preferences but you you imply that what everyone should consider hippy what you do. 32 inch hips maybe what you like, and that's fine if they are in fact 32 , but they real 32' hips I really believe are way below normal if one defines normal as being the average of women that are not considered overweight.

Now I don't have any proof of my claim that 32 is below "average" but a random survey of escort ads I think would show that 36 is the norm of the claims for some of the hottest women in town. Couldn't find a 32 in the first pass. While we know there is very little correlation between escort ads and the truth when they talk about age and weight the distinct perception is that they err towards the "ideal". IE most advertised 34"s would actually be 36 and a lot of 38's get advertised as 36.
 

tboy

Well-known member
Joined Jun 2, 2010
Messages 9,197
Actually, you're not quite accurate with what you feel is the average these days. It is widely known that (at least in North America) everyone is getting bigger due to diet. Not so back in the 70's and 80's. They've even changed the dress sizing so that women can "fool" themselves into thinking they aren't as big as they really are. For eg: they dropped them all down 1 size. What used to be a 9/10 is now a 7/8, a 7/8 is now a 5/6, a 5/6 is now a 3/4 and so on.

As for your escort ads, I don't know where you've been looking but most are 34 and some are even 30 (tricia for eg). That 30 would skew the average down....just like a single 38 would skew it up.

Believe me, 30 yrs ago women were slim....least the ones in my age group....I cite twiggy as an example, I think she was a 32-23-32...

Anyhow, I calls em as I sees em, if you don't like it, well that's your perogative.....

(and I don't believe today's is 18, not for a second....maybe 18 going on 23.....)

Just using cupids as a reference, they have:
30- 1
32- 2
34- 20 (clearly the average)
35- 1
36- 12
38- 6
 

Bubba

Reviewer
Joined Aug 20, 2010
Messages 4,173
Actually, you're not quite accurate with what you feel is the average these days. It is widely known that (at least in North America) everyone is getting bigger due to diet. Not so back in the 70's and 80's. They've even changed the dress sizing so that women can "fool" themselves into thinking they aren't as big as they really are. For eg: they dropped them all down 1 size. What used to be a 9/10 is now a 7/8, a 7/8 is now a 5/6, a 5/6 is now a 3/4 and so on.

As for your escort ads, I don't know where you've been looking but most are 34 and some are even 30 (tricia for eg). That 30 would skew the average down....just like a single 38 would skew it up.

Believe me, 30 yrs ago women were slim....least the ones in my age group....I cite twiggy as an example, I think she was a 32-23-32...

Anyhow, I calls em as I sees em, if you don't like it, well that's your perogative.....

(and I don't believe today's is 18, not for a second....maybe 18 going on 23.....)

Just using cupids as a reference, they have:
30- 1
32- 2
34- 20 (clearly the average)
35- 1
36- 12
38- 6

A simple 8.5/10 would do :neutral: :whip: :slap:
 

LickingGravity

Reviewer
Joined Sep 9, 2010
Messages 4,747
Just using cupids as a reference, they have:
30- 1
32- 2
34- 20 (clearly the average)
35- 1
36- 12
38- 6

Add 1 or 2 to every measurement above to compensate for the escort measuring for advertising bias( deduct up to 5 years,15 pound and 2 inches) and I think that proves the point. Even they have only 7% (before bias correction) with 32 of less.
 

Maurice Boscorelli

Senior Member
Joined May 30, 2010
Messages 19,322
May 16 2011

May 16 2011

0fK1W.jpg
wyk3V.jpg
SAXeC.jpg


SUNshine Girl Iliana, 22, wants to go to law school. We do not object, your honour! This 5-foot-2, brown-eyed beauty can represent us anytime! She loves the beach, soccer, dancing and sushi when she’s not hanging with her gal pals at Starbucks. (Alex Urosevic/QMI Agency)

Two thumbs up from this lad........8.5/10
 

LickingGravity

Reviewer
Joined Sep 9, 2010
Messages 4,747
With the possible exception of the boobs being a little too big ( I know where do I hand in my Man Card) her body looks perfect. Love the abs. Face is great but a smile would be nice - but slightly better than blondie yesterday

9 of 10
 
C

Cycleguy007

Guest
Is it me, or does she look very angry in every pic?

Anyone else getting a "Sheldon Cooper- Doppler effect" vibe?
m0136.gif


I think she'd look better with vertical stripes TBH...
 

tboy

Well-known member
Joined Jun 2, 2010
Messages 9,197
without causing any offence to anyone, I'd say she's a little too busty for my tastes.....but a solid 8/10 for sure......(and that isn't her angry look, that's her "sexy" look lol)

shit, I meant BUSTY....guess I didn't have my morning....T lol......
 

LickingGravity

Reviewer
Joined Sep 9, 2010
Messages 4,747
without causing any offence to anyone, I'd say she's a little too busy for my tastes.....but a solid 8/10 for sure......(and that isn't her angry look, that's her "sexy" look lol)

Well maybe she likes angry sex lol. Could be bonus point territory if angy sex and make-up sex is part of the gig.

Now that you mention it the hair does look a tad busy but one guesses that's easily fixed by getting rid of some of the extentions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom